Student Affairs Educator Certification Core logo with arrow to the right side

Student Affairs Educator Certification

Supporting the Profession Professional Standards Division AVP or "Number Two" Mid-Level Senior Level VP for Student Affairs

NASPA and partner associations developed Student Affairs Educator Certification to recognize professionals' knowledge and incentivize continued learning across student affairs practice. Following a comprehensive review examining evolving professional needs and program engagement, the certification program will no longer offer future participation cycles. NASPA and its partners are exploring alternative models for continuing education and credentialing that better support and strengthen student affairs practice. This page serves as a resource on the Student Affairs Educator Certification program and we look forward to sharing future updates as this work continues.

Certification Overview

NASPA, in partnership with ACUHO-I, ACUI, AFA, ASCA, NACA, and NIRSA, led the development of Student Affairs Educator Certification. More than 375 student affairs professionals earned the Certified Student Affairs Educator (CSAEd) credential, demonstrating knowledge and competency across core areas of the profession including many within the specialty areas of Campus Activities, Campus Housing and Residential Life, Campus Recreation, College Unions, Fraternity and Sorority Life, and Student Conduct Administration. All credentials were issued by the Higher Education Consortium for Student Affairs Certification.

In 2025, the Consortium initiated a comprehensive review of the program to better understand professionals’ perspectives on certification, participation trends, and the evolving landscape of professional learning in higher education. The review affirmed the value certification provided to many participants while also identifying challenges affecting long-term participation and sustainability with the current model.

As a result, several changes were implemented including sunsetting the current model effective July 2026 while NASPA and partner associations explore alternative models for continuing education and credentialing that can better support the profession moving forward. These discussions reflect a shared commitment to supporting the growth of student affairs educators and strengthening the profession through future-focused models. Importantly, all issued credentials will continue to be recognized through their expiration at which point they will be considered a legacy designation. 

Learn More

What is Student Affairs Educator Certification?

Student Affairs Educator Certification was created as a voluntary credential to validate the knowledge of professionals, inform intentional professional development, offer a formal type of recognition, and support career advancement. A general student affairs "Core" credential was offered as well as specialty credentials in Campus Activities, Campus Housing and Residential Life, Campus Recreation, College Unions, Fraternity and Sorority Life, and Student Conduct Administration. All credentials were issued and managed by the Higher Education Consortium for Student Affairs Certification - an association founded by ACUHO-I, ACUI, AFA, ASCA, NACA, NASPA, and NIRSA. Over 375 professionals earned Certified Student Affairs Educators (CSAEd) through the program. All issued credentials will continue to be recognized by the Consortium partner associations through their respective expiration date, at which point they will be considered a legacy credential.

What is certification in general and how does it compare to a certificate?

Certification is a voluntary process through which an organization grants recognition to an individual after verifying they have met certain, minimum requirements. To become certified, an individual must meet eligibility requirements and pass an assessment. Eligibility requirements generally include a minimum amount or level of training/education and years of work experience. Certification usually has ongoing requirements (such as continuing professional development) and a recertification process that need to be met over a designated period for the individual to maintain certification.

Certification is different from a certificate. A certificate program is also voluntary, and is a recognition of an individual’s learning of a designated content area, at a particular moment in time, by an organization. The individual must meet minimum criteria, including participation in a training or education program, and demonstrate comprehension of the program’s learning outcomes via passing an assessment. There are usually no ongoing requirements to maintain a certificate.

A quick way to understand the difference between certification and certificate is that certification focuses on verifying experiences and education obtained elsewhere, and assessing current knowledge and skills; a certificate focuses on educating individuals on intended learning outcomes and then assessing their attainment.

Source: Certification Simplified: A primer for staff and volunteer leaders.

 

Why is the program no longer being offered?

Student Affairs Educator Certification development was initiated in 2019 through the collaborative efforts of practitioners and student affairs preparation graduate faculty across professional associations, levels, and functional areas. The field has changed considerably in this time. The results of a comprehensive program review as well as low program participation rates and continuing education credit attainment have shown that the certification model is not meeting the needs of the field as effectively as designed nor sustainable in its current format. While CSAEds report personal value, and despite significant promotional and support efforts across professional associations, the credential is not broadly recognized nor understood and has limited association with career and professional development. 

Professionals identify cost, time, and work demands as primary barriers to participation and limited plans to pursue certification. Discontinuing future participation in the current program allows for thoughtful reconsideration of the model to continue recognizing current CSAEds and ensure that a potential future model is better aligned with supporting individual professionals and the field.

How are earned credentials continuing to be recognized?

Achieving certification remains a significant professional accomplishment. Each Student Affairs Educator Certification credential that has been granted will be extended by two years from its original expiration date. Updated expiration dates will be reflected in CSAEd records and all credentials will continue to be recognized by the seven founding partner associations through this two-year extension.

Recertification will not occur at the end of this extended period. Credentials will then become a legacy designation, recognized by the seven founding partner associations. 

What was the certification development process?

The topic of student affairs certification has been explored by various professional associations over several years. NASPA engaged in conversations about certification in both 2013 and 2019. The latter process included a survey to 8,700 participants, and 27 focus groups consisting of early career professionals and mid-level educators, vice presidents for student affairs, and graduate faculty. Several positive impressions and critical questions were raised about the potential for student affairs certification through this inquiry. 

In July 2019, the NASPA Board of Directors reviewed and discussed the results and analyses from the survey and focus groups, and voted to approve the initial development of student affairs educator certification. A task force was established to advise the certification development process. Dr. Laura Osteen, NASPA Professional Standards Division Director, was appointed to chair the task force, which consisted of student affairs administrators and educators, graduate preparation faculty, and professional association representatives from ACPA, ACUHO-I, ACUI, AFA, ASCA, NACA, NASPA, NIRSA, and NODA.

A sub-group of the task force was also established to develop a code of ethics for certification. This group, chaired by Dr. Keegan Nichols, NASPA Professional Standards Division, also consisted of student affairs administrators and educators, graduate preparation faculty, and professional association representatives.

Over 115 subject matter experts appointed by ACUHO-I, ACUI, AFA, ASCA, NACA, NASPA, and NIRSA worked with a psychometrician to develop the core and speciality area certification assessments, and determine a passing score for each. Exams were piloted in Fall 2022 and the first Student Affairs Educator Certification credentials were granted in Winter 2023.

How has the field changed since certification was developed?

While there are many important external factors impacting higher education, those most heavily impacting participation in certification are:

  • Limited professional development and travel funding.

  • Restrictions on the use of professional development funds due to certification program content.

  • Increased workload and time constraints.

  • Evolving staffing models and career pathways.

These changes affect professionals’ ability to earn and maintain long-term credentials, as well as perceived “real world” utility of the current model for existing credential holders.

What was learned about the value of certification?

Program participants reported the primary benefits of certification as:

  • Validating knowledge of the overall field and specialty areas, especially professionals without a graduate-level degree as well as professionals with graduate degrees in non-student affairs areas.

  • Providing structure for intentional professional development.

Benefits such as Student Affairs Educator Certification’s incorporation into campus human resource practices, career advancement, and salary increases emerged less consistently and more slowly than anticipated.

What participation trends influenced the decision to change?
  • The highest participation occurred during the pilot cycle in Fall 2022, followed by lower participation in subsequent cycles. These participation rates were significantly lower than projections based on the 2019 market analysis as well as updated projections in 2022.

  • Continuing education earning rates among current CSAEds have been lower than anticipated.

    As of January 2026:

    • 63.5% of CSAEds have not reported earning any Core CEs since achieving their credential.

    • 17% have reported earning under 10 Core CEs.

    • 11.5% have reported earning 10-19 Core CEs.

    • 8% have reported earning 20 or more Core CEs.

  • Financial projections initially anticipated long-term self-sufficiency of the Higher Education Consortium for Student Affairs Certification as an independent organization, however, actual participation trends do not indicate organizational solvency under the current model.

What was the purpose, components, and key outcomes of the program review?

The purpose of the Consortium's review was to assess familiarity, value, and interest of various credentialing models given pressing contextual factors in higher education and certification program participation trends.

The review consisted of the following components:

  • Credentialing Models Survey: 874 (out of 14,008) responses from members across the seven Consortium member associations with the following in their titles: vice president/provost, dean, assistant/associate vice president (AVP), senior director, associate/assistant director, director, coordinator.

  • Focus Groups: 20 focus groups engaging 67 professionals (73% non-certified) across the six certification functional areas and early-career, mid-level, director/dean, and AVP-level positions.

  • CSAEd Census: second annual survey of CSAEds who earned credentials between January 2023 and January 2025 generating 62 out of 289 responses.

The review identified the following key outcomes:

  • Limited awareness of certification's value and who it serves.

  • Lack of understanding of certification’s alignment with graduate education and professional development.

  • Limited connections to on-campus human resources departments and talent management systems.

  • Cost, time commitment, and exam preparation as significant barriers to access.

  • Limited plans to seek certification and of supervisors to encourage their staff to seek certification.

  • Interest in alternative models of credentialing.

What alternatives have professionals expressed interest in?

Several respondents indicated interest in alternative credentialing and professional development approaches including stackable models and micro-credentialing particularly for:

  • Early career professionals.

  • Professionals new to higher education and student affairs who have external work experience.

  • Professionals with graduate degrees outside of higher education and student affairs.

Questions?

Please email [email protected].